Such a BitTorrent client is uTorrent, a well-known program that ranks high among its peers. Sharing files over the Internet using torrents is quite popular and there are a few dedicated applications that can facilitate the file transfer.

I'm not aware of any other client that allows you to do this.You've got the world's most popular torrent client – now make the most of it! Check out tips, apps, cool content and more. if you have HDD's, which is my case, such modification will greatly improve speed and consistency, which makes it even better in that regard. In utorrent, you can set it so that all uploading and downloading is made in sequential order. picotorrent is the closest client in performance to utorrent that I'm aware of. I've done a speed comparison between it and utorrent and I wasn't able to spot major differences in speed or consistency. I've used a client called Picotorrent, which uses 2.x.x libtorrent, for more than one year, and I've never ran into any issues with it. I thought the speed issues on qbittorrent were related to 2.x.x libtorrent, but I was mistaken. some clients feel like they were made by people that don't do any torrenting at all. qbit is comparable, but in transmission for instance it feels like youre totally in the dark at all times. Not only sustained speeds and peer discovery but the situational awareness u get by using it is much higher than in any other client.

Only if they open-sourced utorrent so that people could do stuff with it, like fixing the few bugs, porting to other platforms, and so on. such wasted time and effort developing incomplete and/or buggy clients. all these open source projects have to do is copy utorrent but they seem unable to copy even 1/10th of its feature-set. this situation kinda pisses me off, because I want to use an open-source client.

it baffles me how people think qbittorrent, a bug-ridden excuse of a client is something even remotely comparable to utorrent. I can hardly think of anything to change about it. The interface, the connectivity, the feature-set - it even has a built-in, in-depth user manual. what impresses me the most is that utorrent's setup file is less than half a megabyte, and I'm yet to find a client that consumes as little memory. all other torrent clients absolutely suck in comparison. I was thinking, how is it possible that no other client, after more than one decade, managed to come even close to the feature-set, performance and (extremely small) size of utorrent (2.2.1)? it's wild if you think about it.

Oldversion utorrent 2.2.1